Sunday, March 29, 2009

Response to “The Politics of Rescue”

Before reading this article, I always felt that the United States should not intervene in other countries’ internal affairs. I believed that we had too many problems in our own cities that needed remedy before we went out fixing other people’s problems. Although I still mostly feel this way, this article helped me to recognize and understand viable reasons why the United States should intervene. When people are being made “…victims of [radical] tyranny, ideological zeal, [or] ethnic hatred…”, then I can accept the arguments for foreign intervention. If vast numbers of these victims are being exiled, tortured, or murdered, then I may even have to agree with the arguments. To take it a step further, if the victims themselves are crying out for the foreign interventions, then I do not see how they can be denied.

2 comments:

  1. I agree with you Sasha. There are definite times when intervention is necessary. We all live on the same earth and should be helping on another. Just because we are separate countries doesn't mean we should not interact and aid one another when trying to settle differences.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I also agree with you that there are times when we should intervene in other countries issues. I also agree that we as a country have our own issues that should be dealt with, especially now. However, a lot of countries have situations that are way more severe than our own so we definitely should help when our help is asked for.

    ReplyDelete